Ethics Vs Convenience: Islamic Education Integrated with Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI)

Authors

  • Agus Kurniawan STAI Daarut Tauhiid

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58223/14g2jb72

Keywords:

GenAI, Ethics, Convenience, Islamic Education

Abstract

Abstract: This study aims to explore the advantages and limitations of implementing GenAI technology in Islamic education on campus, as well as to examine the role that lecturers can play in integrating GenAI technology into Islamic education on campus. The research method employed is a descriptive qualitative approach, incorporating a literature review. The results of the study indicate that the use of GenAI technology in Islamic education on campus has several advantages: 1). improving the quality and involvement of learning, 2). encouraging new competencies, and 3). supporting curriculum redesign. However, the implementation of GenAI technology is not free from limitations. The main challenges include: 1). ethical risks and academic integrity, 2). access gaps, and 3). skills, and limitations of frameworks and regulations. The roles that lecturers must take in implementing GenAI technology are: 1). Becoming a facilitator and manager of learning, 2). actively involved in designing a curriculum that integrates GenAI, 3). responsible for equipping students with AI literacy skills, critical thinking, and ethical awareness in using GenAI, and 4). participating in training and professional development to be able to utilize GenAI optimally in line with the vision of holistic Islamic education. 

References

Al-Alawi, A. N., Ivanov, S., Soliman, M., Tuomi, A., & Alkathiri, N. A. (2024). Drivers of generative AI adoption in higher education through the lens of the theory of planned behaviour. Technology in Society, 90.

Campbell, J. (2025). AI in Higher Education: A Meta Summary of Recent Surveys. Campbell Academic Technology Services. https://www.campbell.edu/academics/ai-survey

Chegg. (2025). How many students in higher ed use generative AI?. https://www.chegg.com/blog/ai-in-higher-education

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dalvi, A., Krause, S., & Zaidi, S. K. (2025). Generative AI in Education: Student Skills and Lecturer Roles.

Digital Education Council. (2024). Survey: 86% of Students Already Use AI in Their Studies. https://digitaleducationcouncil.org/surveys/2024-ai

Feuerriegel, S., Hartmann, J., Janiesch, C., & Zschech, P. (2023). Generative AI. ArXiv.

Hasan, M. (2020). Teknologi dalam Pendidikan Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 8(2), 113-125.

HEPI (Higher Education Policy Institute). (2025). Student Survey: Generative AI in Learning. https://www.hepi.ac.uk/2025-ai-survey

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education. Center for Curriculum Redesign.

Janiesch, C., Zschech, P., & Heinrich, K. (2021). Machine learning and deep learning. Electronic Markets, 31, 685–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00475-2

Nasution, F. (2021). Etika Digital dalam Pembelajaran Daring. Jurnal Etika dan Teknologi, 3(1), 45-60.

Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23(4), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G

Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and Technology: Key Issues and Debates. Bloomsbury.

Sharma, A., Shailendra, S., & Kadel, R. (2024). Framework for Adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in Education. IEEE Transactions on Education, 10.

Sujatha, R. (202). AI vs Gen AI: Unraveling the Distinction. DigitalOcean.

Supiana, S., Firdaus, A., Amrullah, A., Zakiah, Q. Y., & Adawiyah, L. R. (2023). Enhancing Learning Quality and Student Engagement: Utilizing Digital Technology in Islamic Education. International Journal of Nusantara Islam, 12.

Uspenskyi, S. (2025). How Many AI Companies Will There Be In 2025 (Latest AI Statistics). SpringApps.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-27

Issue

Section

Articles